research of the external and internal factors of roulette game
Many among you will repeat usual or ritualized speeches : "It is impossible to beat the roulette; neither man nor a machine can predict the next number; you cannot change a negative mathematical expectation into a positive one; each spin of the roulette is independent.... ". We will explain to you not only how to win, but also why you will win.
Often we hear that the roulette does not have a memory. We however are human observers with a memory and the knowledge to code and to deduce the mathematical relations between past and future events. If a mathematician believes all the preceding events are always independent, he won’t test the relationship to the past. The term memory is used in reference to systems which show tendencies towards certain predictions : you can give a weight to events of the past to predict the exit of future numbers. A human being in this way can use his memory to establish relations and to code a connection between past and future spins, and so doing create applicable formulas on other wheels. When we conduct scientific experiments, we know perfectly that the results will not be determined by some parameter apart from the measurable universe, and we believe that only what can be measured, can constitute a valid argument in our processes of experiments.
On the theoretical level, we don’t care about the starting point the croupier uses to launch the ball, if he launches it slowly or quickly, about the weight of the ball, if it’s launched clockwise or anticlockwise, if the casinos change the croupiers after long or brief intervals or after each ball. It has no importance for the stability of the results. For the anecdote, one of our own systems, which we do not propose here, gives results proportional to the number of changes of croupiers. The more frequent the changes, the higher the profits !! Unless through fixing the cylinder at the wheel even, the casinos are unable to change the intrinsic characteristics of the roulette and can thus not counter our systems, neither during a meeting, nor, which is more important, in the long term, as we claim it and show.
In the current state of our studies, we consider that we finally solved the problems of roulette in the broad sense. Therefore we have decided that we could communicate on the former phases and sell several methods on the Internet. However paradoxical it may seem to be, various winning systems can exist. In fact, it is logical : we partly code the Roulette according to preset criterias drawn from other sciences. To some extent, certain filters are valid and usable at a particular time in the game. Still on an higher level , we crossed methods, in order to confirm the candidate numbers, or to eliminate some of them. It gave us the possibility to play only one candidate at one precise moment !! The obtained results are obviously remarkable, but what is proposed here is already sufficient, and thus represents independent systems.
The systems we offer are complex but nevertheless quickly learnable. They need the understanding of our customers, require concentration and an important personal engagement to comprehend the final data. Indeed, a reality as complex as the Roulette is hard to explain in simple terms. We have always sought the greatest clearness and the most precise contextual explanations, explaining the risks and subtleties inherent in each type of application.
The clearest information, a capitalization management of the bets, the abacuses of plays for the follow-up and the control of the course of each meeting, are fundamental elements which make it possible to discipline the work of the player and to transform a hobbyist activity into a true occupation with all the necessary criteria of rigour and self discipline.
We propose systems either with constant bets or with progression for play on the chances. The suggested progression in this case is in its nature comparable with a constant play but with more cautiousness as far as investing is concerned.
Our systems are also expensive : years of research by multi-field teams are expensive and it is logical and obvious that the costs must be shared by the interested customers. The high profits the systems generate, and the structure of the costs are based on years of practice and validations in real application. No system suggested remained without confrontation with reality. Therefore they get a very high credibility and quality, also for long term gambling. The results are definitely higher than other systems found elsewhere. Indeed, we do not speak clearly about some units, but about hundreds of units !! It is not rare that we ourselves, in condition of play, won more than 800 units in a few hours, with a stable average higher than 300 per hour on long term cycles. These results are clearly not comparable with systems found on other sites.
We do not consider the possibility of refunding the purchasers, as we wish they will share a degree of involvement and responsibility we showed during these years. Nevertheless, a service of information is planned for a tailor-made follow-up, by personalized e-mail. We will not give discounts or promotions. Moreover, we won’t be associated with sites of on-line gaming. You will have understood that we are clearly located on another level. But, on the other hand, if a customer would find an improvement concerning the system of Benno Winkel, we will gladly give him one of our most recent discoveries as a reward for the extraordinary quality of this achievement. Innovative ideas can thus become a great stimulus for your personal research !
We do not propose systems based on the signatures of the croupiers, anticipation of the zone where the ball would fall, systems based on the biased wheels, etc...Indeed, we regard such systems as not reliable, non-universal and false. We do know the other free or commercial sites and the majority of the methods suggested. We will not comment on them and will not refer to them. Our discoveries made by our teams in the field of physics and mathematics, led our systems and they constitute a completely different scientific paradigm. All other proposals are incomplete, false and even for example for the system of Benno Winkel, fragmentary and wrong.
